Lunar New Year Collection Now Available!

Converse for Lifting: Why It Works, and What's Actually Better

Why It Works, and What's Actually Better

Converse All Stars became a gym staple almost by accident. The flat, thin sole and minimal drop turned out to be better than most athletic shoes of the era for squatting and deadlifting — not because they were designed for it, but because they weren't designed against it.

Strength athletes noticed. The shoe got recommended. It stuck. There are IPF world record holders who have squatted in Chuck Taylors.

Why Converse Works for Lifting

Two properties make the Chuck Taylor better than a running shoe for strength training:

  • Flat sole. The original Converse sole has minimal heel-to-toe drop — close to zero in most versions. This is the core advantage for deadlifts and flat-footed squats. Your heel stays on the floor. Your hip sets up in its natural position.
  • Thin, relatively firm midsole. Compared to a cushioned running shoe, the Converse sole doesn't compress significantly under load. It's not as firm as a purpose-built lifting shoe, but it's meaningfully better than foam-cushioned alternatives.

These two things, combined with the shoe's low price point and cultural cachet, made it a legitimate training tool for a generation of strength athletes.

Where Converse Falls Short

The limitations follow from the same simplicity:

Canvas construction. Canvas is rigid and stiff — but that rigidity works against it under lifting loads. Converse uses vulcanized construction, bonding the canvas upper directly to the outsole. Under repeated lateral stress from heavy lifting and the creasing that comes with use, the bond between canvas and outsole fails at the flex point. The shoe doesn't deform gradually — the upper separates from the sole. It's a construction limitation, not a material one.

No grip compound. The original Converse rubber outsole is designed for court sports, not for maximum-force floor contact during a heavy pull. It provides adequate grip on a clean gym floor, but it's not optimized for the specific demands of strength training.

No ankle structure. The low-top silhouette (and even the high-top to a degree) provides minimal ankle lockdown. Purpose-built lifting shoes use reinforced heel counters and engineered uppers that keep your foot fixed inside the shoe.

Toe box. Converse has a boxy shape compared to a modern narrow running shoe, but the toe box is still rather narrow. Shoes like Notorious Lift's Radix and Radix Pro have wide EE toe boxes, while keeping the midfoot and heel standard width to prevent unwanted movement.

Durability under load. Canvas wasn't designed to handle the lateral force of a loaded squat or the torsional stress of a heavy deadlift, session after session.

The Step Up

If you're currently training in Converse, the upgrade path is straightforward: a flat, zero-drop training shoe with a purpose-built grip compound, structured upper, and engineering designed specifically for strength training.

The Radix is the most direct upgrade in terms of sole geometry — same flat profile, same zero drop. But offers several distinct advantages: Novus™ Griptech compound on the outsole, a comfortable knit upper with reinforced lateral structure, and an EE wide toe box that gives your foot more room than Converse provides.

The Radix Pro takes this even further with the newer Novus™ 3.0 compound and extended sole flanges for added stability. For serious athletes in competition or for maximum-effort sessions where every detail matters, the Radix Pro is the right tool.

What Converse Can't Do

If your training includes squat variations where heel elevation would benefit your mechanics — which is common for athletes with limited ankle dorsiflexion — you need a shoe that has an elevated heel and a non-compressible sole.

A heeled lifting shoe like the Ronin Lifters handles that job. The 20mm rigid heel is the intentional, controlled version of what a heeled shoe should be for strength training.

The full kit for serious strength training: a flat training shoe (Radix or Radix Pro) for deadlifts and flat-stance work, and a heeled shoe (Ronin Lifters) for squat variations where elevation helps.

👟

Converse Works. Here's Why.

Flat sole. Minimal heel drop. Wide toe box. Those three properties made the Chuck Taylor a legitimate lifting shoe by accident — and they're still the right foundation for deadlifts and flat-stance work.

👣
~0mm
Converse heel drop
📐
0mm
Radix Pro heel drop
🔥
30%
Novus™ Griptech compared to general rubber soles

Converse vs. Flat Training Shoe — Honest Comparison

Property Converse All Star Radix / Radix Pro
Heel drop ~0mm ✅ 0mm ✅
Sole firmness under load Adequate High — Novus™ Griptech compound ✅
Toe box width Standard/boxy — not a wide shoe EE wide — significantly more room ✅
Upper lateral support Canvas — minimal Reinforced structured upper ✅
Grip compound Court rubber — general purpose Novus™ Griptech — strength-optimised ✅
Heel lockdown Minimal Reinforced heel counter ✅
Durability under training load Moderate High — engineered for strength training ✅
Radix — flat minimalist training shoe, EE wide toe box
Radix Pro — precision flat training shoe with Novus 3.0 Griptech sole

Radix (left) and Radix Pro (right) — flat sole, EE toe box, Novus™ Griptech. The same geometry Converse got right, engineered for strength training loads.

Common Questions

Are Converse good for lifting?

For deadlifts and flat-stance work, yes — the flat sole and minimal heel drop are genuine advantages over cushioned running shoes. The limitations show up in upper support, grip compound engineering, and durability under serious training loads. Converse is a capable training shoe. It's not a purpose-built one.

Are Converse better than running shoes for lifting?

Generally, yes — for deadlifts and squats. The flat sole and lower heel drop are more appropriate for lifting than the cushioned, high-drop profile of most running shoes. If you're choosing between the two, Converse is the better call for strength training.

Why do powerlifters wear Converse?

The flat sole and minimal heel drop approximate the geometry of purpose-built flat training shoes at a fraction of the cost. Many competitive powerlifters have used Chuck Taylors for years — the shoe's accidental suitability for lifting is real. Purpose-built options now exist that do the same job better, but the Converse reputation in lifting is earned.

Is Radix better than Converse for lifting?

For strength training specifically: yes. The Radix preserves the flat-sole geometry that makes Converse work for lifting, and adds engineered grip compound, a reinforced upper with lateral structure, and construction designed for training loads. It's not a reinvention — it's the same foundation, executed for the purpose.

Can I squat in Converse?

Yes. Many lifters squat in Converse effectively. The flat sole works well for lifters with good ankle mobility who squat comfortably flat-footed. If you need heel elevation to achieve adequate depth with a neutral spine, a heeled lifting shoe (like the Ronin Lifters) is the better tool.

Built for What Converse Wasn't

Same flat geometry. Engineered for strength training.